Community Forum

Discuss common law, lawful rights, contracts, consent, and the principles explored across Lawful Truths Academy.

Respectful discussion Community learning Earn reputation

Contribution Badges

New MemberContributorScholarSenior ScholarMentor

Earn forum badges as you participate — start discussions, share replies, and collect likes to grow your reputation. Badges recognise your contributions and mark your expertise across the Lawful Truths community.

Natural Law

A law is enacted through proper procedure but is widely considered deeply unjust. Is it valid law?

Discussion in 'Natural Law' started by John, 24 Aug 2026.

Relevant eBook · Chapters 4 & 9

Understand the supreme law that sits above all statutes.

Explore Natural Law

Start the conversation

This thread is a space for lawful, respectful discussion and shared learning.

What's your take on this — what experience or question can you share?

24 Aug 2026
J
JohnNew Member

Scenario: A legislature enacts a statute through entirely proper procedure. The statute is widely considered deeply unjust because it discriminates against a particular group. There is no higher constitutional provision that clearly prohibits it.

Question: Is this valid law? Would your answer differ depending on whether you approach the question from a natural law or legal positivist perspective? What role should moral reasoning play in determining legal validity?

0 votes
#1
Share

0 replies

No replies yet. Be the first to respond.

Please sign in to join the conversation.