Community Forum
Discuss common law, lawful rights, contracts, consent, and the principles explored across Lawful Truths Academy.
Contribution Badges
Audi alteram partem — must both sides always be heard?
Discussion in 'Latin Maxims' started by John, 24 Aug 2026.
Related eBooks
Start the conversation
This thread is a space for lawful, respectful discussion and shared learning.
What's your take on this — what experience or question can you share?
This maxim — 'hear the other side' — expresses the principle of natural justice that both parties must have the opportunity to be heard. But are there exceptions? Are there situations where only one side is heard, such as ex parte applications? When is this justified, and what safeguards should apply?
0 replies
No replies yet. Be the first to respond.
Trending
Hot discussions right now
- 1
Police stop Daniel while he's walking home and ask him to provide his name and address — is he required to provide them?
Police Powers· 1 - 2
A statute conflicts with a foundational constitutional principle — what would you examine?
Constitutional· 0 - 3
What does ubi jus ibi remedium actually mean in practice?
Rights & Remedies· 0 - 4
What is the difference between having a right and having an effective remedy?
Rights & Remedies· 0 - 5
Can someone acquire ownership rights through adverse possession?
Land Law· 0
Related discussions
You might also like
Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea — how important is intention when determining responsibility?
Latin Maxims · 0 repliesNemo judex in causa sua — why can nobody be judge in their own cause?
Latin Maxims · 0 repliesIgnorantia juris non excusat — should ignorance of the law never be an excuse?
Latin Maxims · 0 repliesPolice stop Daniel while he's walking home and ask him to provide his name and address — is he required to provide them?
Police Powers · 0 replies